Serologic response and safety after third dose of the COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background: Vaccines are pivotal for control of the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha have lower serologic response after two COVID-19 vaccine doses. Data regarding a 3rd vaccine are scarce. Method(s): Aim: To assess immune responses to, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD, stratified according to therapy, and compared to healthy controls (HC). Subjects were recruited before the 1st vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer) and prospectively evaluated after the 2nd and 3rd vaccine doses. Evaluation included: Disease activity, anti-spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N), anti-TNFalpha drug levels and adverse events (AE) Results: Of 198 subjects having the 3rd vaccine dose, 125 had IBD: average age: 39.1+/-14.8 years;40.8% females;82-Crohn's disease (CD), 33 ulcerative colitis (UC), 6 pouch, 3 IBD-U. There were 73 HC: average age 39.4+/-12.5 years, 69.9% females. Among patients with IBD: 51 and 74 (40.8%, 59.2%)) were treated or not with anti-TNFalpha, respectively. A month after the 3rd vaccine dose IBD activity was comparable in all patients regardless of treatment, and no increase in C-reactive protein or white blood cells was observed. Higher but not significant AE rate was registered in all subjects after the 3rd compared to 2nd vaccine dose (81% vs. 76%, respectively). AE rate in IBD and HC was comparable. No serious AE detected. There was a significant increase in anti-S levels one month after compared to pre 3rd vaccine dose in all participants. Furthermore, increase was 2-3 folds higher than that observed one month after the 2nd dose. Importantly, patients treated with anti-TNFalpha compared to non-anti-TNFalpha treated had significantly lower responses: 9219 (6347-13390) vs 16955 (13721-20951) (GMC (95%CI)), p<0.05. Serologic response did not correlate with anti-TNFalpha drug levels, antibodies or interval between drug and vaccine administration. During extended follow-up post 3rd dose, we found that lower serologic response predicts infection over time. Conclusion(s): This prospective study shows that a 3rd dose of BNT162b2 vaccine is effective and safe in patients with IBD. Furthermore, patients treated with anti-TNFalpha had significantly lower serologic responses compared to anti-TNFalpha untreated ones. Lack of correlation between anti-TNFalpha drug levels and immune responses suggests there is no need to modify vaccination timing relatively to anti-TNFalpha administration. The significantly steeper increase in anti-S levels between 2nd and 3rd doses, suggests the 3rd dose is crucial in anti-TNFalpha treated patients, specifically due to the fact that higher serologic response predicts better defense from infection.

Serologic Response and Safety after Third Dose of the Covid-19 Bnt162b2 Vaccine in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Introduction: Vaccines are pivotal for control of the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha have significantly lower serologic response after two COVID-19 vaccine doses. Data regarding a 3rd vaccine are scarce. Aims & Methods: We conducted a prospective observational multi-center Israeli study aiming to assess immune responses to, and safety of mRNAbased COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD, stratified according to therapy, and compared to healthy controls (HC). Subjects were recruited before the 1st vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer) and were prospectively evaluated one and six months after the 2nd vaccine dose, as well as one month after the 3rd vaccine dose. Disease activity was assessed using accepted clinical scores and biomarkers. COVID-19 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) antibodies concentrations were analyzed using ELISA. Anti- TNFalpha drug levels were measured using ELISA. Adverse events (AE) were registered. Result(s): Of 198 subjects having the 3rd vaccine dose, 125 had IBD: average age: 39.1+/-14.8 years;40.8% females;82- Crohn's disease (CD), 33 ulcerative colitis (UC), 6 pouch, 3 IBD-U. There were 73 HC: average age 39.4+/-12.5 years, 69.9% females. IBD treatment: 51 (40.8%) patients were treated with anti-TNFalpha: monotherapy 35, concomitant immunomodulators 7, 5ASA 5, steroids 3 and ustekinumab 1. In 74 non-TNFalpha treated patients 5ASA were received by 19, vedolizumab 18, ustekinumab 9, immunomodulators 2, steroids 2, tofacitinib 4, no medication 19 patients. The 3rd vaccine dose was administered 201 (187-216) (median [IQR]) days after the 2nddose and 267 (250-278) days after the 1st dose. A month after the 3rd vaccine dose IBD activity was comparable in all patients regardless of treatment, and no increase in C-reactive protein or white blood cells was observed. Higher but not significant AE rate was registered in all subjects after the 3rd compared to 2nd vaccine dose (81% vs. 76%, respectively). AE proportion in IBD and HC was comparable, mostly local pain. No serious AE detected. Significant increase in anti-S levels one month after compared to pre 3rd vaccine dose was observed in IBD and HC. Furthermore, increase was 2-3 folds higher than that observed one month after the 2nd dose. Importantly, patients treated with anti-TNFalpha compared to non-anti-TNFalpha treated had significantly lower responses: 9219 (6347-13390) vs 16955 (13721- 20951) (GMC (95%CI)), p<0.05. Anti-N levels reflecting infection were positive in only 4 subjects- all with IBD, 2 treated with anti-TNFalpha, 1 ustekinumab, 1 untreated. Serologic response did not correlate with anti-TNFalpha drug levels, antibodies or interval between drug and vaccine administration (p=0.616, p=0.697 and p=0.6, respectively). Conclusion(s): In this prospective study we show that a 3rd dose of BNT162b2 vaccine is effective and safe in patients with IBD, however, patients treated with anti-TNFalpha had significantly lower serologic responses compared to anti-TNFalpha untreated ones. Lack of correlation between anti-TNFalpha drug levels and immune responses suggests there is no need to modify vaccination timing relatively to anti-TNFalpha administration. The significantly steeper increase in anti-S levels between 2nd and 3rd doses, suggests the 3rd dose is crucial in anti-TNFalpha treated patients. Their significantly lower anti-S levels compared to anti-TNFalpha untreated ones may suggest the advantage of a 4th vaccine dose.

WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM COVID-19 BNT162B2 VACCINE PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES TREATED WITH ANTI-TNFα HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER SEROLOGIC RESPONSES

Background: While vaccines against COVID-19 are effective in healthy individuals, we reported significantly lower serologic responses to BNT162b2 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents. As this was apparent already 4 weeks post vaccination, vaccine longevity is concerning. Aim: to assess long-term serologic responses to BNT162b2 in patients with IBD stratified according to medical treatment. Methods: A prospective, observational multi-center Israeli study. Patients with IBD (anti-TNFα treated versus non-anti-TNFα treated) and healthy controls (HC) were followed from before the 1st BNT162b2 dose until 6 months after vaccination. COVID-19 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) antibodies (Abs) concentrations were analyzed by ELISA, followed by neutralization studies. Specific anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) memory Bcells response, serologic responses against variants of concern (VOCs), Beta, Gamma and Delta, immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte cell subsets were evaluated as well. Safety was assessed using questionnaires, clinical and laboratory data. Results: Of 193 subjects, 130 had IBD (45 and 85 in the anti-TNFa and non-anti-TNFα groups, respectively), 63 HC. Serologic response assessed 176 (median) days (IQR 166-186) and compared to 4 weeks after 1st dose significantly declined in all three groups, but was lowest in the anti- TNFα group: 6 months anti-S Abs titer geometric means: 193 (95%CI: 128-292), 703 (520- 951), and 1253 (1023-1534) in anti-TNFα, non- anti-TNFα and HC groups, respectively, p<0.001, Figure 1. This was further supported by neutralization and inhibition studies. Importantly, significantly decreased memory B-cell response towards RBD was detected only in the anti-TNFα group, with the most significant reduction in response to Beta VOC (p<0.0008 and p<0.0001, vs. non-anti-TNFα and HC, respectively). Older age was an additional predictor of lower serologic response. Immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte cell subsets were comparable between the study groups. Infection rate reflected by anti-N Abs was ~1% in all groups. Safety was comparable in all groups. Conclusion: The 6-months serologic response to BNT162b2 vaccine, evaluated prospectively, decreased in all subjects, most prominently in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNFα. Importantly, the latter also had the sharpest decline in serologies, the lowest functional activity and lowest RBD specific memory B-cells. Older age is an additional predictor of decreased serologic response. Altogether, waning of COVID-19 serologic and functional response over 6 months, specifically in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNFα, supports the need for an early third vaccine dose. (Figure Presented)

Within, 6 months from COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases treated with Anti-TNFα have significantly lower serologic responses

Background: While vaccines against COVID-19 are effective in healthy individuals, we reported significantly lower serologic responses to BNT162b2 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents. As this was apparent already, 4 weeks post vaccination, vaccine longevity is concerning. Aim: to assess long-term serologic responses to BNT162b2 in patients with IBD stratified according to medical treatment. Methods: A prospective, observational multi-center Israeli study. Patients with IBD (anti-TNFα treated versus non-anti-TNFα treated) and healthy controls (HC) were followed from before the, 1st BNT162b2 dose until, 6 months after vaccination. COVID-19 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) antibodies (Abs) concentrations were analyzed by ELISA, followed by neutralization studies. Specific anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) memory B-cells response, serologic responses against variants of concern (VOCs), Beta, Gamma and Delta, immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte cell subsets were evaluated as well. Safety was assessed using questionnaires, clinical and laboratory data. Results: Of, 193 subjects, 130 had IBD (45 and, 85 in the anti-TNFα and non-anti-TNFα groups, respectively), 63 HC. Serologic response assessed, 176 (median) days (IQR, 166-186) and compared to, 4 weeks after, 1st dose significantly declined in all three groups, but was lowest in the anti- TNFα group:, 6 months anti-S Abs titer geometric means:, 193 (95%CI:, 128-292), 703 (520-951), and, 1253 (1023-1534) in anti-TNFα, nonanti- TNFα and HC groups, respectively, p<0.001, Figure, 1. This was further supported by neutralization and inhibition studies. Importantly, significantly decreased memory B-cell response towards RBD was detected only in the anti-TNFα group, with the most significant reduction in response to Beta VOC (p<0.0008 and p<0.0001, vs. non-anti-TNFα and HC, respectively). Older age was an additional predictor of lower serologic response. Immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte cell subsets were comparable between the study groups. Infection rate reflected by anti-N Abs was ∼1% in all groups. Safety was comparable in all groups. Conclusion: The, 6-months serologic response to BNT162b2 vaccine, evaluated prospectively, decreased in all subjects, most prominently in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNFα. Importantly, the latter also had the sharpest decline in serologies, the lowest functional activity and lowest RBD specific memory B-cells. Older age is an additional predictor of decreased serologic response. Altogether, waning of COVID- 19 serologic and functional response over, 6 months, specifically in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNFα, supports the need for an early third vaccine dose. (Figure Presented).

Effects of COVID-19 on employment in IBD patients

Introduction: There is an ongoing concern over the impact of COVID-19 on IBD patients. A significant proportion of IBD patients are treated with immunosuppressive medications and their effects on COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes remain of concern to patients and physicians alike. Apart from the clinical outcome, the pandemic may have other psychosocial effects on this vulnerable cohort, such as employment stability. Aims & Methods: The primary aim of this study was to analyze the percentage of patients who tested themselves for COVID-19 and the outcome of those who tested positive. A secondary aim was to assess their employment status. This was a multicentre international study whereby IBD patients (>18 years) in clinical remission over the last year, were asked to answer an anonymous questionnaire. Demographic data, type of IBD, current and previous medication, admissions to hospital, were collected. Exclusion criteria included patients with IBD flares requiring corticosteroids in the previous 12 months. Results: 585 patients (CD: n=325) from 8 European Centres and Israel participated in the study. The mean patient age was 40.1 years (SD+/- 13.1). 21.6% were smokers and 48.5% were non-smokers. The rest were ex-smokers. 44.5% (n=255 ) of patients were tested for Covid-19 and 5.1% (n=13) were positive. The majority were treated at home (92.3%) with only one patient requiring hospital admission. This was a 33-year-old female smoker with UC (E3 disease activity) on anti-TNF therapy. 66.7% of positive cases were on anti-TNF medication and 22.2% were on thiopurines. None of the positive cases were on dual antiTNF/thiopurine therapy. 7.2% of patients had family members who also tested positive for Covid-19. Almost half of all patients (45.2%) had their job affected during the pandemic and this was more prevalent in the UC cohort (P<0.05). 70% of patients switched to remote work from home and 21.4% became unemployed. The average age of patients becoming unemployed was 39.3year (SD+/- 11.9). Conclusion: Nearly half of our cohort (45.2%) were tested for Covid-19. The majority (92.3%) were treated at home, even though two thirds of them were on Anti-TNF medication. Unemployment rates affected 1 in 5 individuals and measures promoting remote work have been taken up wisely by IBD patients. Though the clinical outcomes were excellent, the psychological effects of unemployment may have yet to be considered.

The optimal medical therapy for glycemic control in covid-19

Diabetes is highly linked to the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). My recent meta-analysis also suggested a higher prevalence of diabetes in severe COVID-19 as compared with non-severe COVID-19. Recent observational studies have shown that hypergly-cemia was significantly associated with severity of COVID-19 in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. To prevent worse outcome of COVID-19, more tight glucose control is required. I studied the association between hyperglycemia and worse outcome of COVID-19, the putative beneficial and harmful effects, and clinical outcomes of oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin use in glycemic control among COVID-19 patients, by searching literatures. Although there were some negative studies, the meta-analysis reported that the treatment using metformin was associated with reduction in mortality due to COVID-19. One study showed that treatment with sitagliptin, one of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, during hospitalization was associated with reduction of mortality, with a clinical improvement as compared with patients on the standard care. There were no clinical studies showed effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, pioglitazone and sulfonylurea on COVID-19 outcomes. Regarding sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a case of eugly-cemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) associated with COVID-19 and a case of DKA that was difficult to distinguish from COVID-19 were reported. COVID-19 patients who need hospital care may deteriorate rapidly, an early and appropriate initiation of insulin therapy in hyper-glycemic COVID-19 patients may be to be encouraged. © The authors ;Journal compilation.